October 18, 2004

The Response is, Well, Interesting

Most of us heard and read about the piece in The Guardian suggesting that it's British readers contact voters listed as undecided in Clark County OH and offer their suggestions on how to vote. Well, the Guardian is posting some of the responses it has received.

These fall into three categories for me.

I was surprised to see so many from the US that actually supported the idea. I know, I'm just so innocent sometimes. But really - I thought even the liberals would want to keep this a "family affair". Oops - there I go thinking again. Here's a response that pretty much captures what most in that category had to say:

I am a registered voter in Clark County, Ohio, and am very much interested in hearing what our overseas friends have to say about our election. You are correct in assuming that this election in the US is the most important election in memory. The threat of terrorism is a very real threat, not just in our country, but all over the world. In this day and age there must be worldwide unity against these fanatical groups who just hate. Not just Americans, but all western civilisation.
United States

What scared me the most with this one? The author is from Clark County!!!! I'm speechless.

Then there were the responses requesting that the Guardian, well, butt out.

I suggest that if a particular reader of the Guardian would like to vote in America - would really like to influence the American election, say - that reader should move to America, become a citizen of the United States. Everyone is welcome here. Even the readers of the Guardian. But if you don't wish to be an American, to live in Ohio, for instance, and participate in the American political process, that is too bad. Perhaps there is something wrong with you. Perhaps it is your teeth.
New York

(and this was about the nicest one posted)

Now....I have to believe that there were some reasonable and rational responses received, but those seem to be missing from this story. The Guardian is allowed to publish any collection of them that it chooses to. I would have liked to think it would have been open enough to post a clear cross representation, but being as it is a Liberal paper I'm not surprised.

But I would have liked to have seen some response that were devoid of insults and stereotypes.

Here is my letter to the Guardian. I'm sure it won't ever see the light of day, anywhere but here, but still - it's out there now.

I am an American citizen that is deeply offended by your post suggesting that your Non-American readers should have some influence on our Presidential elections. No, I don't think you should.

You have a country of your own. You have your own elections and we Do Not interferE in that process. Do we have an opinion? Yes, of course we do. Do we write and talk about it? Yes. But, in my memory there has never been an action taken like that suggested by your paper to actually contact voters and sway them to vote as we believe.

Democracy is about Freedom of Choice. Our ability to vote and have a say in who runs this country is one of the most precious parts of that Freedom. I, for one, do not believe that Freedom extends beyond our shores to include other countries or the citizens of those countries.

For the record, I am a conservative and a Bush supporter. My response is not because you do not back the man that I believe to be the best selection. It is because I am amazed that you feel you have the RIGHT to do so.

I do not believe your project will have any real impact on our elections. All it will have accomplished is causing more hard feelings between the citizens.

I'm sorry that you did this. In my mind it was a waste of paper, bandwidth and time.

Posted by Tammi at October 18, 2004 10:58 AM
Comments

I started to write a comment and it wound up being a post, which I cut in order to past it to my blog.

Thanks for the inspiration.

Glad to read you and will comment more later, right now the CFO has a crisis!

Posted by: michele at October 18, 2004 12:59 PM

I really wouldn't get too upset about The Guardian, Tammi. There's been nothing about this on the televised news over here. Seriously. Alex and I don't know anyone we speak to in our daily lives who even knows who John Kerry is!

Contrary to popular belief, most of us don't even know there's an election coming up. It's an incredibly small number of the populace who know, or care. Unfortunately, there are always journalists wanting attention, and getting it.

Don't add fuel to their fire. It's YOUR vote. Your choice.

Posted by: Sally at October 18, 2004 04:08 PM

It's interesting that a marginalised broadsheet from this country did that (I suppose it is their response to the article carried in the Telegraph that went around the blogosphere like wildfire) yet the "mainstream" papers (The Sun, Mirror, etc) didn't bother.

There has been some coverage here via satellite and terrestial TV news channels about the debates but no suggestion or implication that we should be allowed to vote in any way, shape or form. Such is the determination that our decisions should NOT affect the election campaign that even the movement of UK troops to the south of Fallujah is being debated in case it is seen as supporting Bush's re-election bid.

I would have thought that the whole point of the article is to highlight certain areas such as voter apathy, the lack of interest in either candidates, whether they understand what the candidates stand for, etc. The circulation of the Guardian is small, even for a broadsheet, and I think you will find that more and more papers here (and if you could translate them, in Europe as a whole) will pick up on this kind of thing as the election draws nearer.

As a PS you have to understand that neither Bush nor Kerry are particularly popular here. There is as much apathy about the candidates here as there is there I think!

Posted by: Alex at October 19, 2004 02:42 AM